Quick Navigation
Topics
Superconducting Qubits
Security Implications of Measurement Based Crosstalk on Superconducting Quantum Computers
arXiv
Authors: Subarna Adhikari, Kimmo Halunen
Year
2026
Paper ID
78190
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
135
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Crosstalk is one of the major issues for scalability of superconducting quantum processors. But it can also be used by threat actors to intentionally sabotage computations and steal information. This paper analyzes data leakage due to crosstalk during qubit measurement. Prior research yielded an accuracy of 96% in classifying measurement of one qubit in IBM quantum computers. When evaluated on superconducting hardware from VTT, we achieved an accuracy of 71.68% with similar framework. Our extended framework with additional labels yields an accuracy of 76.30% for classifying measurement of one qubit and 53.37% for measurement of two qubits using Support Vector Machine (SVM). Experimental results indicate that measurement operation on a qubit can affect the probability of measuring adjacent qubits. The impact on the target qubit is dependent on the number of neighboring qubits measured and also the measurement outcome.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Superconducting Qubits research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Crosstalk is one of the major issues for scalability of superconducting quantum processors.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.