!
You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.
Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Learning Sparse Quantum States
arXiv
Authors: Aniruddha Sen
Year
2026
Paper ID
78181
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
135
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We study the problem of tomography for k-sparse quantum states. In contrast to classical distribution learning, where tight sample and time complexity bounds in terms of support size are well understood, no non-trivial bounds were previously shown for this problem. We give the first near optimal algorithm for learning n-qubit k-sparse pure quantum states, obtaining fidelity at least 1-varepsilon with high probability using {O}\(k/varepsilon\) copies of the state and {O}\(kn/varepsilon\) time. Both bounds are optimal up to polylogarithmic factors. As an implication, we also obtain an algorithm with near optimal {O}\(kr/varepsilon\) sample complexity for learning k-sparse rank-r mixed states, via the random purification channel technique. Obtaining time complexity nearly matching the sample complexity, for r>1, remains an important open question.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We study the problem of tomography for k-sparse quantum states.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.