Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Foundations
Direct experimental test of Feynman’s path integral postulates with single photons
Crossref
Authors: Yong-Li Wen, Li-Man Tian, Yunfei Wang, Shanchao Zhang, Chang Li, Jianfeng Li, Enke Wang, Hui Yan, Shi-Liang Zhu
Year
2026
Paper ID
77607
Status
Peer-reviewed
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
176
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The experimental validation of fundamental thought experiments in quantum mechanics has profoundly advanced quantum science and technology while deepening our understanding of quantum mechanics. However, experimental studies of the path integral formulation, a cornerstone of quantum physics, remain scarce, especially regarding the two fundamental postulates proposed by Feynman in 1948, neither of which has been directly tested. Here, we present a theoretical proposal for the direct experimental test of Feynman’s postulates, achieved through the development of a rigorous propagator-based approach. Furthermore, we perform comprehensive measurements of single photon’s probability amplitudes for more than 1.4 million (17 5 ) paths, achieving high fidelity in propagator measurements and enabling complete reconstruction of the path probability amplitudes. The results confirm both postulates: (i) that quantum probabilities emerge from the coherent superposition of all possible paths and (ii) that all possible paths have equal-magnitude amplitudes, whereas each path’s phase is determined by the classical action (in units of ħ ). This work not only resolves a longstanding foundational gap but also establishes a general experimental framework for investigating path integrals in contemporary quantum systems.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The experimental validation of fundamental thought experiments in quantum mechanics has profoundly advanced quantum science and technology while deepening our understanding of...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.