Quick Navigation
Topics
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Cosmic Decoherence: Massive Fields
arXiv
Authors: Junyu Liu, Chon-Man Sou, Yi Wang
Year
2016
Paper ID
7754
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
126
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We study the decoherence of massive fields during inflation based on the Zurek's density matrix approach. With the cubic interaction between inflaton and massive fields, the reduced density matrix for the massive fields can be calculated in the Schrödinger picture which is related to the variance of the non-Gaussian exponent in the wave functional. The decoherence rate is computed in the one-loop form from functional integration. For heavy fields with mgtrsim mathcal{O}(H), quantum fluctuations will easily stay in the quantum state and decoherence is unlikely. While for light fields with mass smaller than mathcal{O}(H), quantum fluctuations are easily decohered within 5sim10 e-folds after Hubble crossing. Thus heavy fields can play a key role in studying problems involving inflationary quantum information.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Open Quantum Systems & Decoherence research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2016 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We study the decoherence of massive fields during inflation based on the Zurek's density matrix approach.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.