Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Foundations
Intrinsic volumes of the quantum state space and mutually unbiased bases
Crossref
Authors: Zsombor Szilágyi, Mihály Weiner
Year
2026
Paper ID
77510
Status
Peer-reviewed
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
171
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Abstract Previous studies on the geometrical properties of the state space of a finite-level quantum system have determined its volume and surface area. Building on this foundation, we derive explicit formulas for two additional intrinsic volume quantities. The question of whether a complete set of mutually unbiased bases exists in dimension d can be equivalently framed as whether a specific convex polytope can be inscribed within the state space of a d -level quantum system. One motivation for our work was the hypothesis that a smaller intrinsic volume of the state space compared to the corresponding intrinsic volume of the mentioned polytope could rule out such an inscription. While our computations of these two intrinsic volumes do not lead to this conclusion, they nonetheless provide fundamental insights into the geometric structure of quantum state spaces. In particular, we show that these quantities can be used to rule out the existence of some unit-vector “configurations” (though not the one formed by the bases vectors of a complete set of mutually unbiased bases).
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Abstract Previous studies on the geometrical properties of the state space of a finite-level quantum system have determined its volume and surface area.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.