Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Resource Theories Coherence
Infinite reduction in absorbing time in quantum walks over classical ones
arXiv
Authors: Shuva Mondal, Amrita Mandal, Ujjwal Sen
Year
2026
Paper ID
775
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
125
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We study the absorption time and spreading rate of the discrete-time quantum walk propagating on a line in the presence or absence of an absorber. We analytically establish that in the presence of an absorber, the average absorption time of the quantum walker is finite, contrary to the behavior of a classical random walker, indicating an infinite resource reduction on moving over to a quantum version of a walker. Furthermore, numerical simulations indicate a reversal of this behavior due to the insertion of disorder in the walker's step lengths. Additionally, we demonstrate that in the presence of an absorber, there is a speed-up in the spreading rate, and that a disordered quantum walk that is sub-ballistic regains the ballistic spreading of a clean quantum walk.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Resource Theories & Coherence research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We study the absorption time and spreading rate of the discrete-time quantum walk propagating on a line in the presence or absence of an absorber.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.