Quick Navigation
Topics
Superconducting Qubits
Exponential measurement error mitigation in quantum sampling
Crossref
Authors: He-Liang Huang
Year
2026
Paper ID
77395
Status
Peer-reviewed
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
129
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Abstract Measurement errors limit the fidelity of sampling-based quantum tasks, yet extending error mitigation to sampling remains challenging. Here, we introduce a simple and scalable repetition-based scheme that mitigates measurement errors directly at the sampling level. By encoding each data qubit into multiple physical qubits prior to readout and applying majority-vote decoding, physical errors are converted into a higher-order process, enabling exponential suppression that persists despite realistic gate imperfections during encoding. Using experimental noise profiles from leading superconducting platforms, we demonstrate that a modest linear qubit overhead suppresses measurement errors by several orders of magnitude, significantly boosting fidelities for typical sampling tasks, such as measurement-based quantum computation and random circuit sampling. These results establish a practical, hardware-compatible, and scalable approach for improving the reliability of near-term quantum sampling experiments.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Superconducting Qubits research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Abstract Measurement errors limit the fidelity of sampling-based quantum tasks, yet extending error mitigation to sampling remains challenging.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.