Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Networks
Quantum Machine Learning
Machine Learning-Based Anomaly Detection in Post-Quantum TLS 1.3 Traffic: A Comparative Analysis on the CIC-PQC_OAV v1 Dataset
Crossref
Authors: Serkan Keskin
Year
2026
Paper ID
77122
Status
Peer-reviewed
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
181
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The integration of post-quantum cryptographic algorithms into the TLS 1.3 protocol may alter the behavioral characteristics of network traffic and affect the performance of existing anomaly detection systems. While secure communication in earlier uses of TLS largely relied on classical key exchange mechanisms, the inclusion of post-quantum algorithms in TLS 1.3 sessions may lead to different traffic behaviors. Considering this change, this study performs machine learning-based anomaly detection on the CIC-PQC_OAV v1 dataset. Decision Tree, K-Nearest Neighbor, Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, and XGBoost algorithms were applied using the same training, validation, and test partitions. The models were compared in terms of Accuracy, Precision, Recall, F1-Score, and ROC-AUC. The experimental results show that Decision Tree and Random Forest achieved the most balanced performance, with an Accuracy of 97.79% and an F1-Score of 90.31%. XGBoost stood out in terms of class separability, achieving a ROC-AUC value of 98.35%. The findings indicate that post-quantum TLS 1.3 traffic presents a different and more challenging classification structure than traditional network traffic. Therefore, anomaly detection systems should be re-evaluated by considering the traffic characteristics specific to post-quantum network environments.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Networks research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The integration of post-quantum cryptographic algorithms into the TLS 1.3 protocol may alter the behavioral characteristics of network traffic and affect the performance of...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.