Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Algorithms

Alphabet-Dependent Bounds for Pure Quantum (r,ρ)-Locally Recoverable Codes

arXiv
Authors: Vijay Kumar, Ramakrishna Bandi

Year

2026

Paper ID

76663

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

112

Citations

N/A

Abstract

A quantum (r,ρ)-locally recoverable code ((r,ρ)-qLRC) is a quantum code in which every qudit can be recovered from at most r+ρ-1 other qudits, even after ρ-1 additional erasures inside the recovery set. The bounds currently known for this class, namely the Singleton-like and the GG Singleton-like bounds, are alphabet independent and are therefore loose for small-to-moderate qudit dimensions. In this letter, we derive three alphabet-dependent upper bounds for pure (r,ρ)-qLRCs obtained through the Hermitian CSS construction: a Griesmer-like, a Plotkin-like, and a sphere-packing-like bound. We further establish the asymptotic hierarchy among these bounds and identify the relative-distance regions in which each of them yields the tightest rate constraint.

Why This Paper Matters

  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • A quantum (r,ρ)-locally recoverable code ((r,ρ)-qLRC) is a quantum code in which every qudit can be recovered from at most r+ρ-1 other qudits, even after ρ-1 additional...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #76663 #78853 When irrelevance governs: dissi... #78852 Quantum Information-Theoretic A... #78851 Quantum-assisted rendezvous on ... #78850 An Instability of the Quantum M...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.