Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Alphabet-Dependent Bounds for Pure Quantum (r,ρ)-Locally Recoverable Codes
arXiv
Authors: Vijay Kumar, Ramakrishna Bandi
Year
2026
Paper ID
76663
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
112
Citations
N/A
Abstract
A quantum (r,ρ)-locally recoverable code ((r,ρ)-qLRC) is a quantum code in which every qudit can be recovered from at most r+ρ-1 other qudits, even after ρ-1 additional erasures inside the recovery set. The bounds currently known for this class, namely the Singleton-like and the GG Singleton-like bounds, are alphabet independent and are therefore loose for small-to-moderate qudit dimensions. In this letter, we derive three alphabet-dependent upper bounds for pure (r,ρ)-qLRCs obtained through the Hermitian CSS construction: a Griesmer-like, a Plotkin-like, and a sphere-packing-like bound. We further establish the asymptotic hierarchy among these bounds and identify the relative-distance regions in which each of them yields the tightest rate constraint.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- A quantum (r,ρ)-locally recoverable code ((r,ρ)-qLRC) is a quantum code in which every qudit can be recovered from at most r+ρ-1 other qudits, even after ρ-1 additional...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.