Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Networks
Quantum Foundations
Dataflows and Computational Patterns for Hybrid Quantum-Classical Scientific Computing
arXiv
Authors: Ryan Landfield, Jordan J. Winetrout, Michael A. Sandoval
Year
2026
Paper ID
76607
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
131
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Hybrid quantum-classical computing has emerged as the dominant paradigm for near-term quantum applications, yet hybrid workflows are typically described by individual algorithms rather than their underlying execution behavior. We introduce the Quantum Execution Locality Framework (QELF), a qualitative framework for characterizing hybrid quantum-classical workflows according to recurring dataflow structures and quantum execution locality, the extent to which computation remains resident on the Quantum Processing Unit (QPU) before host intervention or classical synchronization. From a representative cross-section of applications, QELF identifies five recurring computational patterns with distinct locality characteristics and discusses their implications for communication overhead, workflow organization, and future hybrid computing architectures. By providing a common vocabulary for reasoning about hybrid workloads, QELF establishes a foundation for future quantitative validation and the co-design of algorithms, runtime systems, and hybrid computing architectures.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Networks research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Hybrid quantum-classical computing has emerged as the dominant paradigm for near-term quantum applications, yet hybrid workflows are typically described by individual...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.