Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Foundations

Renormalization group ontology in quantum foundations: a non-interacting spin-0 toy model

arXiv
Authors: Gary Kapilevich

Year

2026

Paper ID

76599

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

134

Citations

N/A

Abstract

A realist, anti-psi interpretation of quantum field theory is introduced, based on an expanded ontology that was inspired by the renormalization group. A goal will be to work with a classical non-interacting scalar field "toy model" in the canonical ensemble and show that an observer in this expanded ontology, under certain limiting conditions, will see a QFT. The inverse renormalization group (IRG) will be key in both interpreting this expanded ontology and furnishing novel examples of QFTs. This will lead to a definition of Planck's constant that flows as we head towards a fixed point, is expressed in terms of a temperature, and depends on the observer being studied in this expanded ontology. Our hope is that this approach will lead both to insights into quantum foundations and to prescriptions for developing new QFTs.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • A realist, anti-psi interpretation of quantum field theory is introduced, based on an expanded ontology that was inspired by the renormalization group.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #76599 #77832 Addressing Class Imbalance in E... #77780 Demonstrating Coherent Quantum ...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.