Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Foundations
Renormalization group ontology in quantum foundations: a non-interacting spin-0 toy model
arXiv
Authors: Gary Kapilevich
Year
2026
Paper ID
76599
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
134
Citations
N/A
Abstract
A realist, anti-psi interpretation of quantum field theory is introduced, based on an expanded ontology that was inspired by the renormalization group. A goal will be to work with a classical non-interacting scalar field "toy model" in the canonical ensemble and show that an observer in this expanded ontology, under certain limiting conditions, will see a QFT. The inverse renormalization group (IRG) will be key in both interpreting this expanded ontology and furnishing novel examples of QFTs. This will lead to a definition of Planck's constant that flows as we head towards a fixed point, is expressed in terms of a temperature, and depends on the observer being studied in this expanded ontology. Our hope is that this approach will lead both to insights into quantum foundations and to prescriptions for developing new QFTs.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- A realist, anti-psi interpretation of quantum field theory is introduced, based on an expanded ontology that was inspired by the renormalization group.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.