Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Counterexamples to the fractional coloring conjecture for triply efficient shadow tomography
arXiv
Authors: Jędrzej Stempin, Santiago Llorens, Felix Huber
Year
2026
Paper ID
76556
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
219
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Fractional graph colorings are useful for the Shadow tomography of Pauli observables. In practice, it is desirable that any experimentally interesting set of Pauli operators has a small fractional chromatic number χf for its anticommutation graph. Conjecture 13 in King, Gosset, Kothari, and Babbush [PRX Quantum 6, 010336 (2025)] states that if B_ε\(varrho\) is the set of Pauli observables having expectation value magnitude at least ε in some given quantum state varrho, then the fractional chromatic number of the anticommutation graph G induced by B_ε\(varrho\) is O\(ε-2\). In other words, it asserts that there exists a constant C such that χf cdot ε2 leq C on all states and graphs. If the conjecture were true, it would imply that there exists a triply efficient Pauli shadow tomography algorithm for {\it any} subset S of Pauli observables, provided that there is also an efficient fractional coloring algorithm for the set B_ε. Here we show that the conjecture is false by constructing a family of states and observables for which no finite C satisfying the bound exists. We also give a more general construction relying on the commutation index or β number of a graph. The key ingredient in the proofs can be seen as an instance of the amplification trick, where fractional chromatic numbers, β numbers, and expectation values are amplified through lexicographic graph products.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Fractional graph colorings are useful for the Shadow tomography of Pauli observables.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.