Quick Navigation
Topics
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Systematic corrections to the Thomas-Fermi approximation without a gradient expansion
arXiv
Authors: Thanh Tri Chau, Jun Hao Hue, Martin-Isbjörn Trappe, Berthold-Georg Englert
Year
2017
Paper ID
7652
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
104
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We improve on the Thomas-Fermi approximation for the single-particle density of fermions by introducing inhomogeneity corrections. Rather than invoking a gradient expansion, we relate the density to the unitary evolution operator for the given effective potential energy and approximate this operator by a Suzuki-Trotter factorization. This yields a hierarchy of approximations, one for each approximate factorization. For the purpose of a first benchmarking, we examine the approximate densities for a few cases with known exact densities and observe a very satisfactory, and encouraging, performance. As a bonus, we also obtain a simple fourth-order leapfrog algorithm for the symplectic integration of classical equations of motion.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Open Quantum Systems & Decoherence research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2017 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We improve on the Thomas-Fermi approximation for the single-particle density of fermions by introducing inhomogeneity corrections.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.