Quick Navigation
Topics
Superconducting Qubits
Quantum Networks
Quantum Simulation
Quantum-Inspired Hybrid Neural Networks for Neural Decoding: A Controlled Ablation Study of Learnable Quantum Sidecar Integration
arXiv
Authors: Diana Legziel Levy, Menachem Finkelstein, Peter Chin, Eilon Vaadia, Sarel Cohen
Year
2026
Paper ID
76480
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
145
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We study parameterized quantum circuits (PQCs) integrated as residual sidecar modules within a ResNet-50 backbone for 31-class neural population decoding---imagined handwriting classification from multi-neuron spike rasters. Under strictly controlled conditions (fixed data splits, seeds, and optimizer), we compare four model variants: baseline, quantum sidecar with frozen input projection, quantum sidecar with backbone-gradient-trained projection, and a measurement-guided variant that aligns angle encodings with circuit measurement outcomes. The backbone-gradient variant improves accuracy in 3/4 seeds (+0.19% mean, 95% CI [-1.10%, +1.48%]) and consistently reduces Linear CKA similarity to baseline features $Δ=-0.025$, 4/4 seeds, indicating genuine structural reorganization of representations. A nine-variant ablation identifies simple shallow architectures as the most effective and reproducible configuration. Measurement-guided training consistently improves representation geometry without reducing accuracy. All results use noiseless statevector simulation on 4 qubits, a regime chosen to reflect the practical constraints of current near-term superconducting hardware; no quantum computational advantage over classical methods is claimed.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Networks research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We study parameterized quantum circuits (PQCs) integrated as residual sidecar modules within a ResNet-50 backbone for 31-class neural population decoding---imagined handwriting...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.