Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Foundations
Robust Quantum Key Distribution Arbitrarily Close to Local Correlations
arXiv
Authors: Hari Krishnan SV, Andreas Winter
Year
2026
Paper ID
76474
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
174
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Recently, Wooltorton et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 210802 (2024)] and Farkas [Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 210803 (2024)] have exhibited the mismatch between Bell inequality violations and their cryptographic application in device-independent quantum key distribution, by showing that arbitrarily close to the set of local behaviours there exist quantum correlations guaranteeing a constant rate of secret key. While these results require correlations attaining the maximum quantum value of a suitable Bell observable (aka the Tsirelson bound) and rely on a kind of ideal self-testing of a maximally entangled state and associated Bell measurement, here we show that the effect is robust: for every one of the Bell inequalities considered by Wooltorton et al., a constant rate of secret key ensues if the observed Bell violation is sufficiently close to the respective Tsirelson bound. For these and also the Bell inequalities of Farkas, we furthermore present numerical results based on semidefinite relaxations of the minimum min-entropy consistent with a certain Bell violation, which demonstrate that small but nonzero key rates can be guaranteed (in principle) by practical and efficient means.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Recently, Wooltorton et al.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.