Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Partial-Moment PINNs for Caldeira--Leggett Parameter Learning in Quantum Brownian Motion
arXiv
Authors: Krishna Bhatia
Year
2026
Paper ID
76451
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
124
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We study parameter recovery in the Caldeira--Leggett (quantum Brownian) oscillator from partial moment traces. Our model is a moment-level PINN that predicts the five first/second moments and enforces the linear CL/HPZ ODEs by automatic differentiation. Physical structure is imposed through a PSD (Cholesky) covariance head, high-temperature CL assumptions with Dxpapprox0, and fluctuation--dissipation ties between Dpp and γ. On synthetic CL data with channels {μx,σxx,σxp}, the constrained variant recovers (ω,γ) accurately, stabilizes Dpp, and achieves low rollout error compared to finite differences and Kalman--EM (expectation--maximization) with exact Van Loan discretization. Fisher-style checks confirm that diffusion needs at least one variance observable, and sparse σpp "anchors" restore conditioning. We also show that the same PINN can learn time-varying HPZ coefficients.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We study parameter recovery in the Caldeira--Leggett (quantum Brownian) oscillator from partial moment traces.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.