Quick Navigation
Topics
Superconducting Qubits
Bang-bang protocol for nondispersive qubit readout
arXiv
Authors: Nina del Ser, Yinan Chen, Jacob Steiner, Gil Refael
Year
2026
Paper ID
76426
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
213
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Fast, precise, and quantum-non-demolition (QND) readout of superconducting qubits is a fundamental component of high-fidelity quantum sensing and computation. Conventional approaches typically operate in the dispersive regime, where the qubit-resonator coupling g is weak compared to the detuning Δ. While exhibiting good QND properties, the readout rate is limited to sim g2sqrt{N}/Δll g, where N is the number of photons in the resonator. QND readout in the nondispersive regime, where the readout rate reaches its full potential sim g, relies on parameter sweeps that may encounter resonances, leading to measurement-induced state transitions (MIST). In this work, we study a nondispersive readout protocol that replaces these sweeps by sudden quenches of the coupling constant, using a resonator that is preloaded with photons. We call this protocol bang-bang readout, and show that it realizes single-shot projective measurements. The fidelity and QNDness of the qubit post-measurement are remarkably high, with an error that decreases like 1/N. To arrive at these findings, we develop an analytical theory for the dynamics and measurements of the Jaynes-Cummings (JC) model, including a systematic expansion of correction terms in powers of 1/sqrt{N}. We show that the protocol can also be implemented without preloading the resonator by instead strongly driving the qubit, e.g., with a classical flux drive.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Superconducting Qubits research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Fast, precise, and quantum-non-demolition (QND) readout of superconducting qubits is a fundamental component of high-fidelity quantum sensing and computation.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.