Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Foundations
Observing Bell Inequality Violation Beyond the Qubit Bound in a Spinor Bose--Einstein Condensate
arXiv
Authors: Wenxin Xu, Junshuang Hu, Guillem Müller-Rigat, Xinwei Li, Qi Liu, Matteo Fadel, Li You
Year
2026
Paper ID
76375
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
162
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Correlations allowed by quantum mechanics can defy any classical explanation, with Bell nonlocality standing as their most profound and operationally powerful manifestation. While nonlocality has been demonstrated across a wide range of platforms, in many-body systems it has remained limited to ensembles of qubits, leaving the observation of higher-dimensional multipartite Bell correlations an open challenge. Here we report the observation of qutrit Bell correlations in a spin-1 87Rb Bose-Einstein condensate via the violation of a Bell witness based on collective spin observables only. Exploiting spin-exchange collisions in an ensemble of N simeq 3.1 times 104 atoms, we generate spin-nematic squeezing of -11.8(7) dB and observe a violation that surpasses the minimum bound achievable by a collection of N qubits, providing direct evidence of genuine multipartite qutrit Bell correlations. Our results establish spinor Bose-Einstein condensates as a viable platform for investigating high-dimensional Bell correlations in the many-body regime, and demonstrate that coarse-grained collective measurements suffice to certify the dimensionality of quantum correlations at macroscopic scales.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Correlations allowed by quantum mechanics can defy any classical explanation, with Bell nonlocality standing as their most profound and operationally powerful manifestation.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.