Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Foundations
Computing key rates for one-sided device-independent quantum key distribution
arXiv
Authors: Andreas Bluhm, Gereon Koßmann, Martin Sandfuchs, René Schwonnek, Giuseppe Viola, Ramona Wolf
Year
2026
Paper ID
76330
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
162
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The defining feature of one-sided device-independent quantum key distribution is its asymmetric trust model in which only one party is characterized. This scenario sets an interesting middle ground between high key rates achievable by characterizing devices and the security of full device-independence. Here, we provide new tools, methods, and benchmarks for calculating key rates in this setting. To achieve this, we develop and compare two extensions of the NPA hierarchy and derive finite-size security bounds against general attacks with arbitrary device memory. The latter is based on the Generalized Entropy Accumulation Theorem. We then investigate the performance of various protocols: the BB84 protocol both with and without losses, a qutrit mutually unbiased bases protocol, and protocols based on Bell inequalties such as CHSH and I3322. We find that the choice of which party is characterized can strongly affects the key rate, surprisingly without a universal ordering. Our work thus offers a general toolbox for calculating key rates for one-sided device-independent QKD protocols.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The defining feature of one-sided device-independent quantum key distribution is its asymmetric trust model in which only one party is characterized.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.