Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
The Wigner branching random walk: Efficient implementation and performance evaluation
arXiv
Authors: Yunfeng Xiong, Sihong Shao
Year
2017
Paper ID
7633
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
178
Citations
N/A
Abstract
To implement the Wigner branching random walk, the particle carrying a signed weight, either -1 or +1, is more friendly to data storage and arithmetic manipulations than that taking a real-valued weight continuously from -1 to +1. The former is called a signed particle and the latter a weighted particle. In this paper, we propose two efficient strategies to realize the signed-particle implementation. One is to interpret the multiplicative functional as the probability to generate pairs of particles instead of the incremental weight, and the other is to utilize a bootstrap filter to adjust the skewness of particle weights. Performance evaluations on the Gaussian barrier scattering (2D) and a Helium-like system (4D) demonstrate the feasibility of both strategies and the variance reduction property of the second approach. We provide an improvement of the first signed-particle implementation that partially alleviates the restriction on the time step and perform a thorough theoretical and numerical comparison among all the existing signed-particle implementations. Details on implementing the importance sampling according to the quasi-probability density and an efficient resampling or particle reduction are also provided.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2017 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- To implement the Wigner branching random walk, the particle carrying a signed weight, either -1 or +1, is more friendly to data storage and arithmetic manipulations than that...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.