Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Comparison of Two-Atom Cross Spectra in de Sitter Spacetime, Uniformly Accelerated Minkowski Vacuum, and a Thermal Bath
arXiv
Authors: Zhiming Huang
Year
2026
Paper ID
76293
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
214
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We study the weak coupling of two identical two-level atoms to a four-dimensional massless conformally coupled scalar field and compare three settings with the same local temperature but different physical origins: comoving atoms in the Bunch--Davies vacuum of de Sitter spacetime, transversely separated uniformly accelerated atoms in the Minkowski vacuum, and static atoms in a Minkowski thermal bath. We first derive the two-atom cross spectra in the three settings and then obtain the single-atom local spectra uniformly from the zero-separation limit. When a=H and β=2π/H, the complete local Wightman kernels and local spectra are identical in all three cases. At finite separation, a genuine thermal bath produces a sinc(ΩL) spatial factor, whereas de Sitter spacetime and the transversely accelerated vacuum produce a hyperbolic geometric factor. In the long-distance limit, the cross correlations in de Sitter spacetime and the transversely accelerated vacuum decay as L-2, whereas those in the Minkowski thermal bath decay only as L-1. The de Sitter and transversely accelerated vacuum cross spectra coincide when a=H and the separations are instantaneously matched. For a fixed experimental setup, the physical separation between the two comoving atoms in de Sitter space evolves with cosmic expansion, whereas the pulled-back cross correlations in the uniformly accelerated and thermal Minkowski configurations are stationary.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We study the weak coupling of two identical two-level atoms to a four-dimensional massless conformally coupled scalar field and compare three settings with the same local...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.