Quick Navigation
Topics
Superconducting Qubits
A thermometric quantum Brownian model for low-temperature electronics
arXiv
Authors: Harry T. H. Fung, Thomas M. Stace
Year
2026
Paper ID
76288
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
114
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Quantum mechanical models of resistors in quantum electronics are often based on the quantum optical master equation (QOME). The QOME overlooks several fundamental properties, limiting its ability to model certain superconducting phenomena. Here we present a thermometric model of resistors, adapted from the quantum Brownian motion equation (QBME), that facilitates practical use of the QBME in modelling dissipative electronics at low temperatures. We compare the thermometric QBME presented here with predictions of the QOME, in the simple example of a transmon shunted by a resistor. We show that both the QBME and QOME yield comparable but physically distinct predictions, and discuss potential experimental tests with which to discriminate their use in modelling practical experiments.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Superconducting Qubits research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Quantum mechanical models of resistors in quantum electronics are often based on the quantum optical master equation (QOME).
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.