Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Algorithms

Detecting Axion-Like Particles With Coiled Optical Fibers I: Silica Fibers

arXiv
Authors: Gia Dvali, Sebastian Zell, Tongxuan Zhang

Year

2026

Paper ID

76237

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

114

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We propose a new approach to axion-like particle (ALP) searches based on long, coiled optical fibers in an external magnetic field. We develop the theoretical framework required to describe photon-ALP conversion in this geometry by incorporating transverse boundary conditions and fiber bending. For solid silica fibers with refractive index considerably larger than unity, we show that the leading signal is a phase shift of the photon, with negligible loss due to ALP production. This setup has the potential to set new constraints in the regime of large ALP mass. We further identify parameter regions in which boundary effects become important, in particular for hollow-core fibers, where signals due to ALPs can be significantly enhanced.

Why This Paper Matters

  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We propose a new approach to axion-like particle (ALP) searches based on long, coiled optical fibers in an external magnetic field.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #76237 #78853 When irrelevance governs: dissi... #78852 Quantum Information-Theoretic A... #78851 Quantum-assisted rendezvous on ... #78850 An Instability of the Quantum M...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.