Quick Navigation
Topics
Superconducting Qubits
A quantum generative model for in silico clinical trials using scarce training datasets
arXiv
Authors: Olatz Sanz Larrarte, Reza Dastbasteh, Roberto Sanchez-Navarro, Maria Diez-Campelo, Felipe Prosper, Ana Alfonso-Pierola, Mikel Hernaez, Sara Capponi, Pedro Crespo Bofill, Josu Etxezarreta Martinez
Year
2026
Paper ID
76204
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
182
Citations
N/A
Abstract
In silico methods have emerged as a strategy to complement clinical trials. These are particularly relevant for rare or heterogeneous diseases for which traditional methods are costly or difficult to apply. While classical generative models have shown an extremely good ability to generate high fidelity data when trained using extensive databases, they often struggle when the available samples for training are scarce. In this work, we leverage the potential of quantum computers to represent complex probability distributions to generate high fidelity in silico patients. We propose a pipeline able to combine asymmetric databases into a quantum circuit that serves as a quantum generative model. We evaluate the efficacy of our proposal using a database of Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) patients with 7 clinical variables as a proof-of-concept. We executed our quantum generative model in the IBM Heron r2 "ibm_basquecountry" superconducting quantum computer and compare our method with well known classical baselines. Our results show that the quantum generative model surpasses the classical generative models in generalization and expressivity metrics, indicating its potential validity to generate high fidelity in silico patients for clinical trials.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Superconducting Qubits research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- In silico methods have emerged as a strategy to complement clinical trials.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.