Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Chemistry
Unbiased sampling from Boltzmann distributions with noisy energies
arXiv
Authors: Iwo Sanderski, Gian Gentinetta, Giuseppe Carleo
Year
2026
Paper ID
76114
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
129
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Sampling from the Boltzmann distribution is central to computational physics, yet hard when the energy is known only through a stochastic estimate, such as with machine-learned molecular potentials, in variational Monte Carlo, or on quantum computers, because a noisy energy biases the sampled distribution. The penalty method of Ceperley and Dewing corrects this but requires the noise variance and becomes intractable when it is large. We introduce the Poisson product estimator, an unbiased, non-negative estimator of the Boltzmann weight that only needs an upper bound on the energy estimator and remains efficient at high noise. Using it to optimize a variational quantum circuit gradient-free, we recover the H3^+ ground-state energy in a minimal basis and, by sampling rather than following a single trajectory, also map the variational energy landscape.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Sampling from the Boltzmann distribution is central to computational physics, yet hard when the energy is known only through a stochastic estimate, such as with machine-learned...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.