Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Networks
ZX-Diagram T-Count Reduction Based on Proximal Policy Optimization
DOAJ
Authors: Keyu Xiong, Tao Shang, Chenyi Zhang, Yuchen Liu
Year
2026
Paper ID
75996
Status
Peer-reviewed
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
122
Citations
N/A
Abstract
In fault-tolerant quantum computing systems, the T gates consume more fault-tolerant resources. In this paper, we propose an automated optimization method based on the Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) algorithm. We first translate quantum circuits into ZX-diagrams using ZX-calculus, transforming the circuit optimization problem into a graph rewriting task. Subsequently, the PPO agent, powered by graph neural networks (GNNs) to encode the complex graph structures of the ZX-diagrams, learns to predict efficient transformation paths by focusing on local node and edge features. The PPO algorithm ensures stable policy updates through its clipped objective function, which prevents excessively large and potentially detrimental changes during optimization. Experimental results confirm the method’s effectiveness, showing an average reduction in T-count of 3.12% compared to the baseline approach.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Networks research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- In fault-tolerant quantum computing systems, the T gates consume more fault-tolerant resources.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.