Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Chemistry
Identification and In Silico Selection of Novel Antioxidant Peptides from Asian Swamp Eel Bone: Quantum Chemical Calculations, Molecular Docking, and Zebrafish Model Validation
Crossref
Authors: Xiao Wang, Jianan Zhang, Bingjie Chen, Xinlu Wang, Khushwant S. Bhullar, Yan Yang, Hongru Liu, Lan Wang, Chenggang Cai, Wenzong Zhou
Year
2026
Paper ID
75799
Status
Peer-reviewed
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
150
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Fourteen novel antioxidant peptides were screened from the enzymatic hydrolysates of Asian swamp eel bone (ASEB) through an in silico analysis. Their ABTS and ORAC radical scavenging capacities were 1.70–4.29-fold and 2.79–5.90-fold higher than those of Trolox, respectively. Additionally, two novel peptide sequences (NVGW and WALN) were identified. Quantum chemical calculations combined with active–-site methylation experiments demonstrated that hydrogen atoms on tryptophan’s indole nitrogen, tyrosine’s phenolic hydroxyl, and arginine’s guanidinium group play crucial roles in enhancing ABTS and ORAC activities. Molecular docking further showed stable binding of ASEB peptides to myeloperoxidase (MPO) through hydrogen bonds and electrostatic interactions. Further studies indicated that ASEB alleviated oxidative stress in zebrafish by effectively reducing ROS accumulation, restoring redox homeostasis, and modulating the expression of Keap1–Nrf2 pathway-related antioxidant genes. These results enhance our understanding of the antioxidant properties of ASEB-derived peptides and support the high-value utilization of animal byproducts.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Fourteen novel antioxidant peptides were screened from the enzymatic hydrolysates of Asian swamp eel bone (ASEB) through an in silico analysis.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.