Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Algorithms

Bounds for Pure Disjoint (r,δ)-Quantum Locally Recoverable Codes

arXiv
Authors: Evagoras Stylianou, Holger Boche

Year

2026

Paper ID

75764

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

103

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We study pure disjoint (r,δ)-quantum locally recoverable codes (qLRCs) without assuming a stabilizer structure. We formulate local Knill--Laflamme conditions for recovery from up to δ-1 erasures within a recovery block, and introduce blockwise Shor--Laflamme and unitary weight enumerators that capture how error weight is distributed across recovery sets. We establish several properties of these enumerators and use them to derive a Singleton-like bound that strengthens the known bound for disjoint (r,δ)-qLRCs under a purity assumption, as well as a linear-programming upper bound on the code dimension. These results provide a non-stabilizer, weight-enumerator-based approach to the study of pure disjoint (r,δ)-qLRCs.

Why This Paper Matters

  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We study pure disjoint (r,δ)-quantum locally recoverable codes (qLRCs) without assuming a stabilizer structure.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #75764 #78853 When irrelevance governs: dissi... #78852 Quantum Information-Theoretic A... #78851 Quantum-assisted rendezvous on ... #78850 An Instability of the Quantum M...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.