Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Networks
Quantum Foundations
Verifying full quantum network nonlocality in arbitrary configurations by nonlinear Bell-like inequalities
arXiv
Authors: Shuyuan Yang, Jinchuan Hou, Kan He, Mingxing Luo
Year
2026
Paper ID
75761
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
117
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Full quantum network nonlocality (FQNN) describes a scenario where all sources in a network are nonlocal. Existing criteria of FQNN can only be verified in star networks by violating a single Bell-like inequality. Here we propose a method that certifies FQNN in general quantum networks using only a single Bell-like inequality. We show that the topological obstacle to one-shot detection can be overcome by expanding the original network with a carefully chosen number of auxiliary local sources and parties. The correlations of the enlarged network are then tested with a single inequality; a violation implies that all original sources must be nonlocal. Our approach provides an efficient, experimentally friendly way to verify FQNN in any network topology.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Networks research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Full quantum network nonlocality (FQNN) describes a scenario where all sources in a network are nonlocal.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.