Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Direct fidelity estimation through joint fiducial grouping
arXiv
Authors: Júlia Barberà-Rodríguez, Arthur Strauss
Year
2026
Paper ID
75536
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
200
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Fault-tolerant quantum computation hinges on the requirement for low physical error rates. Reaching below threshold regime requires the accounting of circuit dependent noise, that is inherent to the execution context in which a quantum gate is usually embedded. Direct fidelity estimation is a technique that offers natural context preservation as it solely requires the insertion of local Pauli preparation and measurement fiducials around the window of interest. However, each sampled input-output Pauli pair demands its own preparation and measurement setting, an overhead that grows rapidly once the target gate is no longer Clifford. We introduce joint fiducial grouping, which partitions Pauli pairs into sets with commuting input and output operators, allowing several Pauli-transfer coefficients to be estimated within the same preparation-measurement setting. We derive an unbiased grouped estimator and finite-sample guarantees showing that grouping always reduces the number of distinct input-output settings and can also reduce the required channel uses when the target weight is concentrated within compatible groups. We characterize these gains for the parametric two-qubit gate fSim\(θ,varphi\), and use the grouped estimator as a context-sensitive reward for reinforcement-learning-based gate calibration. Our results provide a practical route to lower-overhead, context-preserving fidelity estimation for continuously parameterized quantum gates.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Fault-tolerant quantum computation hinges on the requirement for low physical error rates.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.