Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Correlation versus Causation in Quantum Criticality
arXiv
Authors: Conrad Wichmann, Ryan Thorngren, Ruben Verresen
Year
2026
Paper ID
75286
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
167
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Correlation functions langle O1(x) O2(0) rangle reveal scaling dimensions through spatial decay. We instead consider static susceptibility, the change in langle O1(x) rangle from perturbing the Hamiltonian by O2(0), which we term causation for short. In a conformal field theory (CFT), dimensional analysis predicts decay of |x|-2Δ for correlation and |x|-2Δ+1 for causation. Yet we find causation can decay up to fifteen additional orders in x through a general mechanism, which we trace to time-derivative fields being unable to contribute to static response. In higher-dimensional CFTs, this mechanism ensures leading causation arises from primaries, even when descendants dominate correlation, which we leverage with DMRG to identify a previously unresolved corner primary of Δapprox 8.8 and a heavy magnetic line defect primary of Δapprox 4.6 in the (2+1)D critical Ising model. Moreover, the same mechanism governs edge-mode localization in (1+1)D gapless symmetry-protected topological phases, explaining previously observed anomalously small edge-mode splittings and guiding our construction of spin chains with splittings as small as 1/L18 and 1/L25.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Correlation functions langle O1(x) O2(0) rangle reveal scaling dimensions through spatial decay.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.