Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Networks
Quantum Foundations
Perfect Games in Dimension-Bounded Communication
arXiv
Authors: E. Zambrini Cruzeiro
Year
2026
Paper ID
75069
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
170
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Perfect prepare-and-measure games exhibit an all-or-nothing quantum advantage: a quantum system of dimension d satisfies every prescribed winning constraint, whereas a classical d-level message cannot. We establish two structural results for such forbidden-output support constraints. First, every binary-output support game reduces exactly to a conflict graph: perfect classical realization with a d-level message is equivalent to d-colorability, perfect d-dimensional quantum realization is equivalent to a d-dimensional orthogonal representation, and the minimum number of Bob inputs realizing a fixed conflict graph is its edge biclique-cover number. Second, for an arbitrary finite output alphabet, every perfect qubit strategy admits a perfect classical-bit realization. As a flagship application, the 13-ray qutrit graph yields a compressed game (X,Y,B)=(13,8,2) with C3=39<Q3=S=40, and eight Bob inputs are minimal among all binary-output realizations of that graph. Graph extensions demonstrate the mechanism in every dimension, while Torpedo and antidistinguishability games illustrate the genuinely nonbinary regime. These results connect exact communication, graph coloring, contextuality, state exclusion, and zero-error information theory.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Networks research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Perfect prepare-and-measure games exhibit an all-or-nothing quantum advantage: a quantum system of dimension d satisfies every prescribed winning constraint, whereas a...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.