Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Lower bounds for the CNOT-complexity of linear reversible operators
arXiv
Authors: Søren Fuglede Jørgensen
Year
2026
Paper ID
74140
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
155
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The CNOT-complexity of an invertible matrix over mathbb{F}2 is the minimum number of CNOT gates needed to synthesize the corresponding linear reversible operator. While the maximum CNOT-complexity over all n times n matrices is known to be Θ\(n2 / log n\), no explicit family of matrices requiring a superlinear number of CNOT gates is known, and until now the hardest explicitly known family has been the cyclic permutations, with CNOT-complexity 3(n-1). We show that lower bounds for the additive complexity of not-necessarily-reversible linear operators can be lifted to the reversible setting with only a small loss. As an application, we use this to describe an explicit family of matrices, constructed from parity-check matrices of error-correcting codes, with CNOT-complexity at least 4n - o(n), asymptotically surpassing the cyclic permutations. Moreover, this construction yields an explicit matrix A in GLn\(mathbb{F}2\), n = 17167, whose CNOT-complexity exceeds that of the cyclic permutation on n symbols.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The CNOT-complexity of an invertible matrix over mathbbF2 is the minimum number of CNOT gates needed to synthesize the corresponding linear reversible operator.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.