Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
Practical advantage beyond the quadratic speedup limit with fully-quantum walks
arXiv
Authors: Massimiliano Incudini, Guglielmo Mazzola
Year
2026
Paper ID
74111
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
178
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We introduce a new class of fully-quantum Metropolis walks in which both the proposal and acceptance steps are intrinsically quantum. Unlike standard quantum walks obtained by quantizing classically efficient Markov chains, our algorithm employs Hamiltonian simulation as a quantum-native proposal mechanism, enlarging the class of quantum walks beyond classical counterparts. We target the problem of sampling from the low-temperature Gibbs distribution of classical dense Ising models, within a fixed error in total variation distance. This approach achieves about a cubic polynomial asymptotic advantage over previous quantum-walks, resulting in a total sixth-degree polynomial queries speedup compared to the best classical walk. This shows that speedups beyond the widely assumed quadratic limit are possible within the quantum walk formalism. We perform a complete fault-tolerant compilation of all algorithmic primitives and benchmark against CPU, GPU, and FPGA implementations of the best classical Markov chain. Under identical hardware assumptions, the resulting advantage runtime crossover is reduced from approximately 103 years for conventional quantum walks to less than one day. These results identify fully-quantum Markov chains as a promising route toward practical quantum advantage.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We introduce a new class of fully-quantum Metropolis walks in which both the proposal and acceptance steps are intrinsically quantum.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.