Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Networks
NoisePQC++: A Unified NIST-Compliant PQC and Hybrid-PQC Implementation of the Noise Protocol
arXiv
Authors: Nadeem Ahmed, Aryya Gangopadhyay, Lei Zhang
Year
2026
Paper ID
73944
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
178
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The threat of quantum computers to classical public-key cryptography has created an urgent need to evolve secure communication protocols with post-quantum cryptographic (PQC) primitives. The Noise Protocol Framework, widely used in systems such as WireGuard and WhatsApp, traditionally relies on the Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman (ECDH) public-key exchange scheme, which is vulnerable to quantum threats. In this paper, we present NoisePQC++, a unified C++23 implementation of the Noise Protocol framework augmented with post-quantum Key Encapsulation Mechanisms and Hybrid Forward Secrecy. Our design integrates the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) standardized ML-KEM algorithm alongside classical ECDH, enabling full PQC, hybrid ECDH+PQC handshakes, and unified support for all 57 classical Noise handshake pattern variants, 13 post-quantum Noise handshakes, and their hybrid variants. Compared with prior work, NoisePQC++ offers broader protocol coverage, more complete implementation support, and greater flexibility. Our evaluation shows minimal overhead under normal network conditions and acceptable overhead in adverse cases, while significantly improving resistance against quantum adversaries. These results indicate that NIST-standardized post-quantum and hybrid Noise handshakes are practical and provide a credible basis for future deployment.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Networks research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The threat of quantum computers to classical public-key cryptography has created an urgent need to evolve secure communication protocols with post-quantum cryptographic (PQC)...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.