You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.
Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Cryptography Security
Advantages of the coherent state compared with squeeze state in unidimensional continuous variable quantum key distribution
arXiv
Authors: Xuyang Wang, Yanxia Cao, Pu Wang, Yongmin Li
Year
2018
Paper ID
7393
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
129
Citations
N/A
Abstract
In this work, a comparison study between unidimensional (UD) coherent-state and UD squeeze-state protocols is performed in the continuous variable quantum key distribution domain. First, the UD squeeze-state protocol is proposed and the equivalence between the prepare-and-measure and entanglement-based schemes of UD squeeze-state protocol is proved. Then, the security of the UD squeeze-state protocol under collective attack in realistic conditions is analyzed. Lastly, the performances of the two UD protocols are analyzed. Based on the uniform expressions established in our study, the squeeze-state and coherent-state protocols can be analyzed simultaneously. Our results show that the UD squeeze-state protocols are quite different from the two-dimensional protocols in that the UD squeeze-state protocols have a poorer performance compared with UD coherent-state protocols, which is opposite in the case of two-dimensional protocols.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Cryptography & Security research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2018 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- In this work, a comparison study between unidimensional (UD) coherent-state and UD squeeze-state protocols is performed in the continuous variable quantum key distribution domain.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.