Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Algorithms

No low-degree tests for quantum states

arXiv
Authors: Omar Alrabiah, Srinivasan Arunachalam, Sabee Grewal, John Wright

Year

2026

Paper ID

73855

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

139

Citations

0

Abstract

We study the problem of testing low-degree phase states, namely m-qudit quantum states of the form q-m/2 sum_{x in mathbb{F}qm} omegaf(x) |x>, where f is a degree-d polynomial. In contrast to the classical setting, where low-degree polynomials admit highly efficient classical testers, it is not known whether analogous quantum tests exist. We show that no such quantum low-degree test exists: any tester requires Omega\(binom{lfloor m/2rfloor}{lfloor (d-1\)/2 rfloor}) copies to determine whether a given state is a degree-d phase state or is far from every such state. Our results follow from a general framework that relates quantum testing of codeword phase states to classical decoding properties of the dual code, which allows us to leverage known bounds on the tolerance of high-rate Reed--Muller codes to random errors.

Why This Paper Matters

  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We study the problem of testing low-degree phase states, namely m-qudit quantum states of the form q^-m/2 sum_x in mathbbFq^m omega^f(x) |x>, where f is a degree-d polynomial.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #73855 #78853 When irrelevance governs: dissi... #78852 Quantum Information-Theoretic A... #78851 Quantum-assisted rendezvous on ... #78850 An Instability of the Quantum M...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal • updated 2026-10-21 02:56:42

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.