Quick Navigation

Topics

Open Quantum Systems Decoherence Superconducting Qubits

Echo trains in pulsed electron spin resonance of a strongly coupled spin ensemble

arXiv
Authors: Stefan Weichselbaumer, Matthias Zens, Christoph W. Zollitsch, Martin S. Brandt, Stefan Rotter, Rudolf Gross, Hans Huebl

Year

2018

Paper ID

7378

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

79

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We report on a novel dynamical phenomenon in electron spin resonance experiments of phosphorus donors. When strongly coupling the paramagnetic ensemble to a superconducting lumped element resonator, the coherent exchange between these two subsystems leads to a train of periodic, self-stimulated echos after a conventional Hahn echo pulse sequence. The presence of these multi-echo signatures is explained using a simple model based on spins rotating on the Bloch sphere, backed up by numerical calculations using the inhomogeneous Tavis-Cummings Hamiltonian.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Superconducting Qubits research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2018 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We report on a novel dynamical phenomenon in electron spin resonance experiments of phosphorus donors.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #7378 #78837 TLS loss in superconducting res... #78829 Graphene double quantum dot as ... #78817 Modelling Josephson Junctions w... #78809 A quasiparticle-protected super...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.