Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Machine Learning
From hyperplanes to hyperellipsoids: characterizing the inherent interpretability of linear and single-qubit mixed-state binary classification models
arXiv
Authors: Kaitlin Gili
Year
2026
Paper ID
73557
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
145
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We characterize and compare the inherent interpretability offerings of a standard linear model with a single qubit mixed state model for the task of supervised binary classification. A side by side comparison reveals that a single qubit mixed state model for binary classification is just the "ellipsoid version" of standard linear model classification. More precisely, rather than learning a hyperplane to classify data, we learn a hyperellipsoid. We discuss the consequences of the geometric inductive biases of both models, as well as how each model contains a different feature importance inductive bias. This short characterization offers an accessible route to quantum machine learning (ML) ideas for readers who have zero background in quantum and are only familiar with linear classification in ML. In support of ML pedagogy, we encourage instructors to utilize this piece to smoothly introduce quantum ML ideas into the undergraduate ML classroom.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We characterize and compare the inherent interpretability offerings of a standard linear model with a single qubit mixed state model for the task of supervised binary...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.