Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Algorithms

Reverse engineering of single-qubit quantum gates

arXiv
Authors: Gustavo Fernandes da Costa, Leonardo K. Castelano, Emanuel Fernandes de Lima

Year

2026

Paper ID

73506

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

111

Citations

0

Abstract

In this work, we address the problem of designing single-qubit quantum gates by means of a linearly-polarized field. We show that any desired one-qubit gate corresponding to a special unitary matrix can be generated by a modulated sinusoidal field. The only approximation involved is the rotating-wave-approximation. The formula for the control field is obtained by inverting the equation of motion for the evolution operator and imposing the conditions for the desired gate. We give a simple procedure to obtain closed analytical formulas for the fields in terms of a priori chosen dynamical functions. Additionally, these dynamical functions can depend on tunable free parameters intentionally introduced to meet a desired performance criteria.

Why This Paper Matters

  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • In this work, we address the problem of designing single-qubit quantum gates by means of a linearly-polarized field.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #73506 #73581 Magnetosensitivity of amphibian... #73577 A Hybrid Classical-Quantum Appr... #73575 A Novel Hybrid Quantum Reservoi... #73574 Observation of Phase Space Dyna...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal • updated 2026-07-29 00:34:38

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.