!
You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.
Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Removing inhomogeneous broadening in cross-relaxation spectra via hole burning
arXiv
Authors: Fei Kong, Zhehua Huang, Zhengze Zhao, Pengju Zhao, Zhecheng Wang, Ya Wang, Fazhan Shi
Year
2026
Paper ID
73470
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
141
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Quantum relaxometry based on nitrogen-vacancy (NV) centers in diamond is an easy-to-use technique that detects magnetic noise by measuring the longitudinal relaxation of NV centers. It is favored in chemical and biological applications due to the robustness against imperfect spin control. By tuning the energy level, NV relaxometry can detect magnetic noise generated by other spins and obtain magnetic resonance spectra through cross relaxation. However, the inhomogeneous broadening of NV centers greatly limits the spectral resolution of cross-relaxation spectra. Here we demonstrate a hole-burning technique to remove the inhomogeneous broadening. We utilize a weak pump field to deplete specific NV centers during the relaxation measurement, which contribute a reverse signal in the cross-relaxation spectra with a much narrower linewidth. Our method retains the convenience and sensitivity of NV relaxometry, opening up new avenues for high-resolution magnetic resonance spectroscopy in complex scenarios.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Quantum relaxometry based on nitrogen-vacancy (NV) centers in diamond is an easy-to-use technique that detects magnetic noise by measuring the longitudinal relaxation of NV...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.