Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Algorithms

The Apparatus Strikes Back: Momentum Conservation and the Cost of Spatial Superpositions

arXiv
Authors: Lucas C. Céleri, Diogo O. Soares-Pinto, Daniel A. Turolla Vanzella

Year

2026

Paper ID

73040

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

274

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Preparing massive particles in coherent spatial superpositions is a central objective of modern quantum science, motivated by applications ranging from fundamental tests of quantum mechanics and gravity to quantum-enhanced sensing. The experimental difficulty of realizing such superpositions is usually attributed to environmental decoherence mechanisms whose impact depends on the details of the experimental implementation. Here we identify a universal constraint arising from momentum conservation and the quantum nature of the preparation apparatus. Any protocol that places a particle of mass m in a spatial superposition with separation d necessarily entangles the particle with the center-of-mass degree of freedom of the apparatus responsible for the splitting. The resulting recoil displacement, fixed by conservation of the mass dipole moment, reduces the coherence of the particle when the apparatus is not included as part of the quantum system. For an apparatus of mass M, preserving coherence requires the recoil displacement to remain smaller than the coherence length of the apparatus center-of-mass state, leading to a quantitative bound expressible as a constraint on its temperature and on how rigidly the apparatus is anchored to the laboratory frame. We analyze the implications of this bound for current matter-wave interferometry experiments, proposals for gravitationally mediated entanglement, and tests of quantum mechanics near the Planck scale. Our main result, which may seem counterintuitive, is that the recoil of even heavy macroscopic apparatuses can pose a surprisingly strong constraint on the coherence of spatial superpositions of particles with masses well below the Planck mass. Finally, we discuss why the resulting limitation should be regarded as a conservative estimate and under which conditions it can be interpreted as an instance of false decoherence.

Why This Paper Matters

  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Preparing massive particles in coherent spatial superpositions is a central objective of modern quantum science, motivated by applications ranging from fundamental tests of...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #73040 #73047 What It Is Like To Be A Quantum... #73046 On multipoles, their decomposit... #73042 The verifier side of speculativ... #73039 Exact Lindbladian Dynamics from...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.