Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Networks
When Routes Run Out: Adversarial Co-Learning and Explainable Robustness in Quantum Repeater Networks
arXiv
Authors: Brennan Bell, Inti Gabriel Mendoza Estrada, Andreas Trügler, Paul Erker
Year
2026
Paper ID
73008
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
144
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We study an adversarial bandit problem for entanglement-based quantum-network routing over a modest graph corpus. Alice selects an end-to-end repeater route for an Ekert-91 protocol (E91) representing her move, while Eve selects an attack surface, either edge intercept--resend or repeater memory degradation. Payoffs are drawn from cached SeQUeNCe-simulated E91 transcripts, and Alice accepts a turn when the finite-sample statistic violates the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt (CHSH) bound. Performing adversarial co-learning across 50 structured topologies, we find that learned retention tracks a full-matrix minimax reference closely Pearson $r=0.99$: under a one-surface Eve action model, bottleneck families have zero retention, while non-bottleneck families follow a 1-1/N coverage principle. We then fit decision-tree explanation models to graph-, attack-, and route-level topology-corpus targets and report their faithfulness. Finally, we construct prompt records for local language models to summarize the tree evidence, resulting in an open-source explanation workflow for quantum-repeater network games.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Networks research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We study an adversarial bandit problem for entanglement-based quantum-network routing over a modest graph corpus.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.