Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Networks
A combinatorial framework for clustering graph states: Algorithms and hardness for rank-integrity
arXiv
Authors: Romain Bourneuf, Nathan Claudet, Sang Yoon Kim, Rose McCarty, Blair D. Sullivan, Stéphan Thomassé
Year
2026
Paper ID
73003
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
239
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We introduce a new notion of distance between two graph states |Grangle and |G'rangle on the same set of qubits. This distance is the minimum number of ancilla qubits in a graph state |widehat{G}rangle from which both |Grangle and |G'rangle can be "easily prepared". (When preparing graph states, we are only allowed to use one-qubit Clifford gates, one-qubit Pauli measurements, and classical communication.) We give a graphical description of this distance through the lens of vertex-minors. We then show how this distance yields quantum network analogs of many graph edit-distance problems. Using this framework, we develop classical algorithms for identifying the "highly entangled clusters" of a graph state |Grangle. The ancilla integrity problem asks, given a graph G and integer k, for the minimum - over all graph states |G'rangle with distance at most k from |Grangle - of the maximum component size of G'. Up to a factor of 2 in the number of ancilla qubits, this problem is equivalent to rank integrity, where the distance between G and G' is instead the minimum rank of the sum of their adjacency matrices over GF(2). We prove that rank integrity is XP parameterized by k. We also prove the complementary hardness result that rank integrity is W[1]-hard in k. Finally, we give an explicit mathcal{O}\(n6\)-time algorithm for ancilla integrity when G has n vertices and k=1.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Networks research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We introduce a new notion of distance between two graph states |Grangle and |G'rangle on the same set of qubits.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.