Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Networks
Certified quantum supremacy in entanglement-assisted prepare-measure random-access-code
arXiv
Authors: Rajdeep Paul, Prabuddha Roy, A. K. Pan
Year
2026
Paper ID
72956
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
159
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We develop a family of semi-device-independent (SDI) entanglement-assisted prepare-measure (PM) communication games involving two parties, within the nā l random-access code (RAC) framework where the sender Alice holds a n-bit string and communicates l<n bits or qubits to the receiver Bob. In contrast to the standard quantum PMRAC, here the parties share a prior entanglement, and Alice applies quantum operations on her sub-system to encode her inputs and sends to Bob. We first consider the 4ā l entanglement-assisted PMRAC with l=1 and 2 and derive the optimal quantum success probabilities using an elegant analytical technique. We demonstrate quantum supremacy over both classical RACs and conventional quantum PMRACs. Moreover, we exhibit that the optimal quantum advantage allows one to certify Alice's unitary operations. We then derive an upper bound on the quantum success probabilities for 5ā l entanglement-assisted PMRAC with l=1,2 and 3. Further, we extend the demonstration of quantum advantage for nā n-2 case where n is arbitrary.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Networks research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We develop a family of semi-device-independent (SDI) entanglement-assisted prepare-measure (PM) communication games involving two parties, within the n -> l random-access code...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.