Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Networks
Quantum Foundations
Security of passive entanglement-based key distribution protocols
arXiv
Authors: Shun Kawakami, Koichi Takasugi, Koji Azuma
Year
2026
Paper ID
72937
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
143
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Entanglement-based key distribution protocols, such as the Bennett-Brassard-Mermin 1992 (BBM92) protocol and quantum conference key agreement (QCKA), are promising applications of quantum networks. In practical implementations, passive measurement setups are widely adopted because of their simplicity. However, the security analysis of passive protocols with biased basis choice is highly nontrivial, since standard proof techniques for threshold detectors are generally not applicable in this setting. In this work, we establish the security of passive entanglement-based key distribution protocols in the asymptotic regime. Specifically, we prove the security of passive BBM92 with biased basis choice and extend the proof to passive QCKA with an arbitrary number of parties. In addition, we numerically show that the key generation rate of passive BBM92 is almost identical to that of the corresponding active protocol. Our results provide a theoretical foundation for practical passive implementations of entanglement-based key distribution protocols.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Networks research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Entanglement-based key distribution protocols, such as the Bennett-Brassard-Mermin 1992 (BBM92) protocol and quantum conference key agreement (QCKA), are promising applications...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.