Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Networks
Unified monogamy and polygamy relations for multipartite systems
arXiv
Authors: Yue Cao, Naihuan Jing, Kailash Misra, Yiling Wang
Year
2026
Paper ID
72677
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
175
Citations
N/A
Abstract
For a bipartite entanglement measure mathcal{E} that satisfies the γth-power monogamy inequality Eq. eqref{e:chap1-ineq1}, and for its assisted counterpart mathcal{E}a that obeys the δth-power polygamy inequality Eq. eqref{e:chap1-ineq2}, we introduce a unified, tunable framework indexed by a parameter mgeq1. Within this framework, we derive two hierarchical families of refined inequalities: a tightened α-power monogamy relation for mathcal{E}, valid for all αgeq mγ; a tightened β-power polygamy relation for mathcal{E}a, applicable for (m-1)δ< βleq mδ. As m increases, the bounds become progressively tighter, recovering known results at m=1. Notably, the optimal monogamy bound emerges as a piecewise function of α, with additional correction terms activated as α crosses successive integer thresholds, thereby offering a sharper characterization of entanglement distribution. We demonstrate that our results generalize and strengthen existing monogamy and polygamy relations through analytical comparisons and numerical evaluations using concurrence and concurrence of assistance. This hierarchical, parameterized approach offers enhanced and flexible tools for applications in quantum communication, quantum networks, and multipartite quantum information processing.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Networks research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- For a bipartite entanglement measure mathcalE that satisfies the γth-power monogamy inequality (Eq.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.