Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Networks
Implicit differentiation of tensor network algorithms
arXiv
Authors: Lander Burgelman, Anna Francuz, Paul Brehmer, Lukas Devos, Jutho Haegeman, Frank Verstraete, Bram Vanhecke
Year
2026
Paper ID
72640
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
171
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The current leading approach to the variational optimization of projected entangled-pair states (PEPS) is based on automatic differentiation, which allows for a convenient evaluation of the energy gradient with respect to the local variational degrees of freedom. However, evaluating the energy gradient not only remains a major computational bottleneck of the optimization procedure, but also suffers from frequent numerical instabilities. In this work, we adopt recent advances in implicit differentiation techniques to address these challenges in PEPS optimization. By reformulating the core step of the gradient computation in terms of a single characteristic equation for the contraction environment, we reduce the cost of the gradient computation and improve its scaling with the problem size. By choosing a suitable parametrization of this characteristic equation based on the intrinsic symmetries of the contraction environment, we can directly remove instabilities from the global gradient computation that would otherwise arise from the derivatives of subroutines of the contraction algorithm. Finally, we demonstrate how this approach drastically simplifies the practical implementation of stable gradient-based PEPS optimization.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Networks research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The current leading approach to the variational optimization of projected entangled-pair states (PEPS) is based on automatic differentiation, which allows for a convenient...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.