Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
Quantum Chemistry
Beyond Wigner sampling: Effect of initial conditions and substitution on simulated ESIPT in salicylidene aniline.
PubMed
Authors: Turcas I, Castet F, Merritt ICD
Year
2026
Paper ID
72577
Status
Peer-reviewed
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
158
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Upon excitation, salicylidene aniline (SA)-based photoswitches can undergo a sub 100 fs excited-state intramolecular proton transfer (ESIPT), a necessary first step in the overall photoswitching mechanism. Using non-adiabatic ab initio molecular dynamics simulations (NAMD), we have studied ESIPT in SA and selected derivatives with either sterically hindered backbones or electronically active substituents. By comparing different methods used to sample the initial ground-state distribution of the molecule which vary in their capacity to describe low-frequency anharmonic modes and/or quantum effects, we have shown that the ESIPT yield of this molecule is sensitive to the initial conditions, varying by as much as 24%. The ESIPT yield has also been shown to be sensitive to the inclusion of solvents. Finally, we have investigated how molecular substitutions can be used to modulate the ESIPT yield, showing how rational design can be used to increase it by 19%, while also demonstrating the unpredictability of photoinduced reactivity and thus the interest of screening using NAMD.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Upon excitation, salicylidene aniline (SA)-based photoswitches can undergo a sub 100 fs excited-state intramolecular proton transfer (ESIPT), a necessary first step in the...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.