Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
High Success Probability, Fidelity, and Purity Nonlinear Optical Two-Qubit Gates on Chip
arXiv
Authors: Minghao Shang, Hua-Ying Liu, Ying Wei, Xiaoyi Liu, Qianhao Ning, Lijian Zhang, Shi-Ning Zhu, Zhenda Xie
Year
2026
Paper ID
72460
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
88
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Optical two-qubit gate with high success probability, fault-tolerant fidelity, and high-purity outputs is a fundamental yet unsolved challenge, essential for large-scale optical quantum computing toward quantum advantage. Here, we propose a feasible scheme for such gate using thin-film lithium niobate platform, enabling \c{hi}(2) nonlinear photon-photon interaction with 100% efficiency. By decoupling photon interaction and qubit flip operations, fidelity ceiling is removed, and output state purity is recovered by spectral-phase pre-compensation based on a full-spectral photon interaction model, yielding a CNOT gate with 84% success probability, 93% purity, and unity fidelity.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Optical two-qubit gate with high success probability, fault-tolerant fidelity, and high-purity outputs is a fundamental yet unsolved challenge, essential for large-scale...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.